Search results

Research on employee mobility has proliferated in the past four decades across four research traditions: Economics, sociology, management, and organizational behavior/human resource management. Despite significant overlap in interest and focus, these four streams of research have evolved independent from each other, resulting in a structural divide. We provide a detailed account of the research on employee mobility and the structural divide across disciplines. We document that the payoff from this profusion of research and increasing interest has been disappointing, as reflected in the limited number of cross-disciplinary citations, even among common topics of interest. However, our analysis also provides some encouraging signs in the form of specific journals and individuals who provide a bridge for cross-disciplinary fertilization.

I use the 1998–2004 Workplace Employee Relations Survey (WERS) panel data set of British establishments to analyze the effect of team production (either autonomous/self-managed or closely managed) on financial performance. The pattern of evidence is consistent with a positive association between team production in an establishment's largest occupational group and the likelihood of improved financial performance for that establishment. However, the results are mixed concerning whether the positive effects of teams are larger for autonomous teams versus nonautonomous teams.

Jaroslav Vanek argues that the ecological degradation of the planet is more severe in a capitalist system than it would be in a fully democratic one. At the heart of the ecological preservation question is how the classic public goods problem can be solved, and we are skeptical that a fully democratic system could solve this problem any better than the capitalist system, particularly given that consumer demand for environmental protection appears to be income elastic and that the capitalist system can be expected to generate higher levels of societal wealth than the democratic system. While we disagree with Vanek's conclusion and with many of its underlying arguments, we agree that the ecological well-being of the planet is of great importance, that it is expected that economic activity will have ecological implications, and, therefore, that it is well worth comparing the expected ecological impacts of alternative socio-economic systems.

A substantial literature examines the effect of high-performance workplace practices on various outcomes for firms and workers. However, little attention has been paid to the effect of broad job design on product quality or financial performance. And with rare exception, the empirical literature on outcomes from high-performance work practices treats those practices as exogenously determined. This chapter seeks to address these two shortcomings in the existing literature. Using a nationally representative cross-section of British employers in 2004, we measure the effect of multiskilling on establishment-level labor productivity, product quality, and financial performance. We find that treating multiskilling as an endogenous choice of employers in empirical models of organizational performance has significant implications for the results. In particular, the estimated (positive) effect of multiskilling on labor productivity vanishes when we treat multiskilling as an endogenous choice of employers. Treating multiskilling as an endogenous choice changes its estimated effect on product quality from zero to positive and substantially increases the estimated magnitude of its (positive) effect on financial performance.

Using data from a large cross-section of British establishments, we ask how different firm characteristics are associated with the predicted benefits to organizational performance from using team production. To compute the predicted benefits from using team production, we estimate structural models for financial performance, labor productivity, and product quality, treating the firm's choices of whether or not to use teams and whether or not to grant teams autonomy as endogenous. One of the main results is that many firm characteristics are associated with larger predicted benefits from teams to labor productivity and product quality but smaller predicted benefits to financial performance. For example, this is true for union recognition as measured by the number of recognized unions in an establishment. Similarly, when a particular firm characteristic is associated with lower benefits from teams to labor productivity or product quality, the same characteristic is frequently associated with higher predicted benefits to financial performance. This is true for the degree of financial participation and employee ownership and also for establishment size and a number of industries. These results highlight the advantages of analyzing broader measures of organizational performance that are more inclusive of the wide spectrum of benefits and costs associated with teams than the labor productivity measures frequently studied in the teams literature.

The series Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms was launched over 25 years ago by Derek C. Jones and Jan Svejnar. Since then, Advances has been a leading forum for high-quality original theoretical and empirical research in the broad area of participatory and labor-managed organizations. Although general and specialized journals publish work in this field, many do so only occasionally. Advances has been the only annual periodical that presents some of the best papers in the field in a single volume.

Continuing in the tradition of earlier volumes in the series, the 12th edition of Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms interprets the themes of the series quite broadly and, consequently, the following pages traverse a highly variegated terrain. I have marked this expansive landscape with four guideposts around which our discussion is organized, namely sections on job design and organizational performance (Part I); compensation, worker attitudes, and productivity (Part II); worker cooperatives and nonprofit organizations (Part III); and free trade and the ecological effects of alternative socio-economic systems (Part IV). The following essays exhibit a diversity of topics, data sources, modes of analysis, geographic contexts, and philosophies. The contributors are similarly diverse, hailing from seven countries, with representation both inside and outside of academia. It is my hope that, in addition to contributing to our knowledge of the broad subject at hand, the articles contained in this volume will inspire productive future work on the important questions addressed herein.